A major filip for "No" campaigners this morning with the Northern Echo leader column recommending readers to reject the elected Mayor proposal later in the week.
Pete Barron, the editor chaired the debate on Friday, of course. I can also reveal that the Echo had separate meetings with both the "Yes" and "No" sides a couple of weeks ago. I went along with Alan Charlton, and we were given a thorough grilling by Pete, Chris Lloyd and Dave Roberts regarding the rationale of the "No" position. I believe Stuart Hill and Clive Owen batted for the "Yes" side.
I don't think either camp can describe the Echo as having been partisan one way or the other over this matter, which is why their endorsement for a "No" vote at this time is particularly important. It's a recommendation with a rider, of course - Darlington Labour Group has to continue to open up the workings of the Council, and make better use of the many talents available.
But fundamentally, the leader asks (and I paraphrase) "are things so broken in Darlington that we have to take the huge risk that an elected Mayor represents?" I agree with the Echo that the answer has to be "No".